Review



hsv 1 dna polymerase  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher hsv 1 dna polymerase
    17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and <t>17ΔA</t> <t>HSV-1</t> genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of <t>DNA</t> <t>polymerase</t> normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.
    Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/SUCROSE+EP%2FBP%2FNF+12KG/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__06__697999-257-14-33
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv 1 dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation"

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.06.697999

    17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and 17ΔA HSV-1 genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of DNA polymerase normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.
    Figure Legend Snippet: 17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and 17ΔA HSV-1 genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of DNA polymerase normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Infection, Two Tailed Test, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Comparison, Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Activation Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the enhancer-blocking ability of the predicted CTCF insulator sites. A . Schematic representation of CTCFBSDB predicted CTCF binding sites in the UL region of the HSV-1 genome near VP16. B . Representative orientations for each of the constructs tested include the commercially available pGL3-control vector with an SV40 promoter and a luciferase gene as the plasmid backbone; the LTE inserted into the control vector; each putative CTCF-binding site identified in Table S1 together with ∼150-350 bp flanking sequences inserted downstream of the LTE. C . Luciferase reporter assays were performed in N2a as a representative neuronal cell line. All transfections were completed in triplicate. Data represent at least three biological replicates. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-control vector as a fold change in expression relative to control (set to 1). CTRL2 served as a positive control with known LTE-blocking activity in N2a. Statistical comparisons were done on fold changes between the LTE construct and the LTE-CTCF site. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 by unpaired two-tailed Student s t-tests with unequal variance.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the enhancer-blocking ability of the predicted CTCF insulator sites. A . Schematic representation of CTCFBSDB predicted CTCF binding sites in the UL region of the HSV-1 genome near VP16. B . Representative orientations for each of the constructs tested include the commercially available pGL3-control vector with an SV40 promoter and a luciferase gene as the plasmid backbone; the LTE inserted into the control vector; each putative CTCF-binding site identified in Table S1 together with ∼150-350 bp flanking sequences inserted downstream of the LTE. C . Luciferase reporter assays were performed in N2a as a representative neuronal cell line. All transfections were completed in triplicate. Data represent at least three biological replicates. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-control vector as a fold change in expression relative to control (set to 1). CTRL2 served as a positive control with known LTE-blocking activity in N2a. Statistical comparisons were done on fold changes between the LTE construct and the LTE-CTCF site. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 by unpaired two-tailed Student s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Techniques Used: Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Blocking Assay, Binding Assay, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Expressing, Positive Control, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test

    CTCF and cohesin proteins are enriched on CTUL1 during HSV-1 latency but evicted by 2 hpr. Protein binding was determined by ChIP or CUT&RUN and quantified by qPCR using primers and probes specific to the given gene regions of HSV-1 (Table S2). All relative values for CTCF enrichment were normalized to those of the non-specific binding control IgG and were plotted as fold enrichment relative to IgG (set to 1). n=3-5. A. LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 and harvested at 8 dpi for ChIP. CTCF binding in LUHMES was validated at the host positive control region H19/Igf2. qPCR primers specific to CTUL1 or CTRL2 were used to quantitate CTCF enrichment (Table S2). gC served as a negative control of CTCF binding on HSV-1 genome. Each ChIP assay represented one 6-well plate of cells. n=3. Binding significance was determined by Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05. B. CUT&RUN-qPCR was performed with quiescently infected LUHMES cells as described above. CTCF binding significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). n=3. C. ChIP-qPCR was done with the anti-STAG2 antibody on latently infected LUHMES. STAG2 binding in LUHMES was validated at a host positive control region on human Chromosome 1, as previously reported (Table S2). Primers specific for CTUL1 were used to quantitate STAG2 on each site following ChIP. n=4. gC served as a negative control on the viral genome without STAG2 enrichment. Binding significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005. D . LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 for 8 days and subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours, followed by ChIP-qPCR. CTCF bound/input values at CTUL1 and CTRL2 were normalized to bound/input at host H19/Igf2. Then, fold change was calculated between 2 hpr and latency (set to 1). * p <0.05, ** p <0.005 by Student’s t-test. E . ChIP-qPCR done with anti-STAG2 antibody on LUHMES subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours. Fold change values plotted were calculated by setting latency to 1. n=3. F . Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test CTUL1 as an enhancer-blocker to the VP16 promoter in the presence of the CTUL1 insulator binding site and the LTE. A 294-bp random sequence was inserted in place of CTUL1. G. Transient transfections were performed in N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-basic vector (set to 1). * p< 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.
    Figure Legend Snippet: CTCF and cohesin proteins are enriched on CTUL1 during HSV-1 latency but evicted by 2 hpr. Protein binding was determined by ChIP or CUT&RUN and quantified by qPCR using primers and probes specific to the given gene regions of HSV-1 (Table S2). All relative values for CTCF enrichment were normalized to those of the non-specific binding control IgG and were plotted as fold enrichment relative to IgG (set to 1). n=3-5. A. LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 and harvested at 8 dpi for ChIP. CTCF binding in LUHMES was validated at the host positive control region H19/Igf2. qPCR primers specific to CTUL1 or CTRL2 were used to quantitate CTCF enrichment (Table S2). gC served as a negative control of CTCF binding on HSV-1 genome. Each ChIP assay represented one 6-well plate of cells. n=3. Binding significance was determined by Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05. B. CUT&RUN-qPCR was performed with quiescently infected LUHMES cells as described above. CTCF binding significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). n=3. C. ChIP-qPCR was done with the anti-STAG2 antibody on latently infected LUHMES. STAG2 binding in LUHMES was validated at a host positive control region on human Chromosome 1, as previously reported (Table S2). Primers specific for CTUL1 were used to quantitate STAG2 on each site following ChIP. n=4. gC served as a negative control on the viral genome without STAG2 enrichment. Binding significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005. D . LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 for 8 days and subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours, followed by ChIP-qPCR. CTCF bound/input values at CTUL1 and CTRL2 were normalized to bound/input at host H19/Igf2. Then, fold change was calculated between 2 hpr and latency (set to 1). * p <0.05, ** p <0.005 by Student’s t-test. E . ChIP-qPCR done with anti-STAG2 antibody on LUHMES subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours. Fold change values plotted were calculated by setting latency to 1. n=3. F . Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test CTUL1 as an enhancer-blocker to the VP16 promoter in the presence of the CTUL1 insulator binding site and the LTE. A 294-bp random sequence was inserted in place of CTUL1. G. Transient transfections were performed in N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-basic vector (set to 1). * p< 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Techniques Used: Protein Binding, Binding Assay, Control, Infection, Positive Control, Negative Control, ChIP-qPCR, Two Tailed Test, Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Sequencing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

    A model illustrating how CTCF insulators regulate VP16 de novo gene expression upon HSV-1 reactivation. Beige line indicates HSV-1 genome. Rectangles on the genome denote elements regulatory elements: blue: LAT enhancer; red/green: VP16 promoter; yellow: insulators. Red line denotes transcriptional repression while green line denotes activation. In latency, CTUL1 and another unidentified insulator are enriched with CTCF protein and anchored by the cohesin complex. This structure insulates LTE from turning on the VP16 promoter. In reactivation, CTCF proteins evict from the insulators and cohesin moves away. The loss of enhancer-blocking activity allows LTE to turn on the VP16 promoter.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A model illustrating how CTCF insulators regulate VP16 de novo gene expression upon HSV-1 reactivation. Beige line indicates HSV-1 genome. Rectangles on the genome denote elements regulatory elements: blue: LAT enhancer; red/green: VP16 promoter; yellow: insulators. Red line denotes transcriptional repression while green line denotes activation. In latency, CTUL1 and another unidentified insulator are enriched with CTCF protein and anchored by the cohesin complex. This structure insulates LTE from turning on the VP16 promoter. In reactivation, CTCF proteins evict from the insulators and cohesin moves away. The loss of enhancer-blocking activity allows LTE to turn on the VP16 promoter.

    Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Activation Assay, Blocking Assay, Activity Assay

    Related Articles

    One Step RT-PCR:

    Article Title: Acyclovir and A?42 peptide attenuates HSV-1-induced miRNA-146a levels in human brain cells
    Article Snippet: .. HSV-1 DNA polymerase was analyzed in total RNA samples using a One-Step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using the forward and reverse primers 5-CATCACCGACCCGGAGAGGGAC-3′ and 5-GGGCCAGGCGCTTGTTGGTGTA-3 [ 2 , 16 ]. ..

    Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation
    Article Snippet: .. Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine. ..

    Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation
    Article Snippet: .. Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine. ..



    Similar Products

    96
    Thermo Fisher hsv 1 dna polymerase
    17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and <t>17ΔA</t> <t>HSV-1</t> genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of <t>DNA</t> <t>polymerase</t> normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.
    Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/SUCROSE+EP%2FBP%2FNF+12KG/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__06__697999-257-14-33
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv 1 dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa hsv 1 encoded dna polymerase ul30
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Hsv 1 Encoded Dna Polymerase Ul30, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/DNA+Polymerase+I/pmc06723821-101-0-21
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv 1 encoded dna polymerase ul30 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PrimerDesign Inc hsv type 1 and 2 dna polymerase (ul30) gene genesig® standard kit
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Hsv Type 1 And 2 Dna Polymerase (Ul30) Gene Genesig® Standard Kit, supplied by PrimerDesign Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/human+parainfluenza+virus+type+1++hpiv1++haemagglutinin+neuraminidase+glycoprotein/pm28081512-62-29-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv type 1 and 2 dna polymerase (ul30) gene genesig® standard kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Pfizer Inc recombinant hsv-1 dna polymerase
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Recombinant Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase, supplied by Pfizer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/recombinant+hsv+1+dna+polymerase/pmc03723632-278-41-5
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant hsv-1 dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher hsv 1 dna polymerase hsv 1 dna polymerase
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/DNA/pmc02953363-60-4-21
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv 1 dna polymerase hsv 1 dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Knopf Inc hsv-1 dna polymerase
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase, supplied by Knopf Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/herpes+simplex+virus+dna+polymerase/pm17931712-65-4-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv-1 dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Biotechnology Information hsv-1 dna polymerase plasmid
    Primers used for plasmid construction.
    Hsv 1 Dna Polymerase Plasmid, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hsv+1+dna+polymerase/hsv+1+gb+open+reading+frames/pmc01200985-243-7-42
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hsv-1 dna polymerase plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and 17ΔA HSV-1 genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of DNA polymerase normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.06.697999

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 17ΔA gene expression following the application of reactivation stimulus wortmannin. A. wt and 17ΔA HSV-1 genome copies in quiescently infected LUHMES cells (MOI of 0.1). Relative genome load was determined by qPCR copy number of DNA polymerase normalized to that of host GAPDH. (n=3). Statistical significance between wt and 17ΔA was calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with equal variance. B. VP16 gene expression in 17ΔA was quantified by qRT-PCR in LUHMES cells. Cells were quiescently infected at an MOI of 0.2 and total RNA was extracted at 8 dpi (latency), 1, 3, 6 and 24 hpr. Gene expression was quantified using primers and probes listed in Table S2. Relative values for each gene were normalized to host GAPDH expression and were plotted as fold change in expression relative to latency (set to 1). n=3. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 following Student’s t-tests. C . Expression of representative genes from each kinetic class were quantified by RT-qPCR as described in panel B. D . Comparison between gene expression of wt and 17ΔA at 1 and 6 hpr. E. Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the activation of VP16 promoter in neurons using the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, pGL3 basic-LTE (n.t.118,889-119,478), VP16 promoter only, VP5 promoter only, and VP16 or VP5 promoter inserted into the LTE plasmid. F. Luciferase reporter assays were performed in mice N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3 basic vector (set to 1). Statistics were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Article Snippet: Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Infection, Two Tailed Test, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Comparison, Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Activation Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the enhancer-blocking ability of the predicted CTCF insulator sites. A . Schematic representation of CTCFBSDB predicted CTCF binding sites in the UL region of the HSV-1 genome near VP16. B . Representative orientations for each of the constructs tested include the commercially available pGL3-control vector with an SV40 promoter and a luciferase gene as the plasmid backbone; the LTE inserted into the control vector; each putative CTCF-binding site identified in Table S1 together with ∼150-350 bp flanking sequences inserted downstream of the LTE. C . Luciferase reporter assays were performed in N2a as a representative neuronal cell line. All transfections were completed in triplicate. Data represent at least three biological replicates. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-control vector as a fold change in expression relative to control (set to 1). CTRL2 served as a positive control with known LTE-blocking activity in N2a. Statistical comparisons were done on fold changes between the LTE construct and the LTE-CTCF site. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 by unpaired two-tailed Student s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.06.697999

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test the enhancer-blocking ability of the predicted CTCF insulator sites. A . Schematic representation of CTCFBSDB predicted CTCF binding sites in the UL region of the HSV-1 genome near VP16. B . Representative orientations for each of the constructs tested include the commercially available pGL3-control vector with an SV40 promoter and a luciferase gene as the plasmid backbone; the LTE inserted into the control vector; each putative CTCF-binding site identified in Table S1 together with ∼150-350 bp flanking sequences inserted downstream of the LTE. C . Luciferase reporter assays were performed in N2a as a representative neuronal cell line. All transfections were completed in triplicate. Data represent at least three biological replicates. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-control vector as a fold change in expression relative to control (set to 1). CTRL2 served as a positive control with known LTE-blocking activity in N2a. Statistical comparisons were done on fold changes between the LTE construct and the LTE-CTCF site. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005, *** p <0.0005 by unpaired two-tailed Student s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Article Snippet: Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine.

    Techniques: Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Blocking Assay, Binding Assay, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Expressing, Positive Control, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test

    CTCF and cohesin proteins are enriched on CTUL1 during HSV-1 latency but evicted by 2 hpr. Protein binding was determined by ChIP or CUT&RUN and quantified by qPCR using primers and probes specific to the given gene regions of HSV-1 (Table S2). All relative values for CTCF enrichment were normalized to those of the non-specific binding control IgG and were plotted as fold enrichment relative to IgG (set to 1). n=3-5. A. LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 and harvested at 8 dpi for ChIP. CTCF binding in LUHMES was validated at the host positive control region H19/Igf2. qPCR primers specific to CTUL1 or CTRL2 were used to quantitate CTCF enrichment (Table S2). gC served as a negative control of CTCF binding on HSV-1 genome. Each ChIP assay represented one 6-well plate of cells. n=3. Binding significance was determined by Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05. B. CUT&RUN-qPCR was performed with quiescently infected LUHMES cells as described above. CTCF binding significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). n=3. C. ChIP-qPCR was done with the anti-STAG2 antibody on latently infected LUHMES. STAG2 binding in LUHMES was validated at a host positive control region on human Chromosome 1, as previously reported (Table S2). Primers specific for CTUL1 were used to quantitate STAG2 on each site following ChIP. n=4. gC served as a negative control on the viral genome without STAG2 enrichment. Binding significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005. D . LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 for 8 days and subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours, followed by ChIP-qPCR. CTCF bound/input values at CTUL1 and CTRL2 were normalized to bound/input at host H19/Igf2. Then, fold change was calculated between 2 hpr and latency (set to 1). * p <0.05, ** p <0.005 by Student’s t-test. E . ChIP-qPCR done with anti-STAG2 antibody on LUHMES subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours. Fold change values plotted were calculated by setting latency to 1. n=3. F . Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test CTUL1 as an enhancer-blocker to the VP16 promoter in the presence of the CTUL1 insulator binding site and the LTE. A 294-bp random sequence was inserted in place of CTUL1. G. Transient transfections were performed in N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-basic vector (set to 1). * p< 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.06.697999

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CTCF and cohesin proteins are enriched on CTUL1 during HSV-1 latency but evicted by 2 hpr. Protein binding was determined by ChIP or CUT&RUN and quantified by qPCR using primers and probes specific to the given gene regions of HSV-1 (Table S2). All relative values for CTCF enrichment were normalized to those of the non-specific binding control IgG and were plotted as fold enrichment relative to IgG (set to 1). n=3-5. A. LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 and harvested at 8 dpi for ChIP. CTCF binding in LUHMES was validated at the host positive control region H19/Igf2. qPCR primers specific to CTUL1 or CTRL2 were used to quantitate CTCF enrichment (Table S2). gC served as a negative control of CTCF binding on HSV-1 genome. Each ChIP assay represented one 6-well plate of cells. n=3. Binding significance was determined by Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05. B. CUT&RUN-qPCR was performed with quiescently infected LUHMES cells as described above. CTCF binding significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). n=3. C. ChIP-qPCR was done with the anti-STAG2 antibody on latently infected LUHMES. STAG2 binding in LUHMES was validated at a host positive control region on human Chromosome 1, as previously reported (Table S2). Primers specific for CTUL1 were used to quantitate STAG2 on each site following ChIP. n=4. gC served as a negative control on the viral genome without STAG2 enrichment. Binding significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. * p <0.05, ** p <0.005. D . LUHMES cells were infected at MOI of 0.3 for 8 days and subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours, followed by ChIP-qPCR. CTCF bound/input values at CTUL1 and CTRL2 were normalized to bound/input at host H19/Igf2. Then, fold change was calculated between 2 hpr and latency (set to 1). * p <0.05, ** p <0.005 by Student’s t-test. E . ChIP-qPCR done with anti-STAG2 antibody on LUHMES subjected to wortmannin treatment for 2 hours. Fold change values plotted were calculated by setting latency to 1. n=3. F . Luciferase reporter constructs were generated to test CTUL1 as an enhancer-blocker to the VP16 promoter in the presence of the CTUL1 insulator binding site and the LTE. A 294-bp random sequence was inserted in place of CTUL1. G. Transient transfections were performed in N2a cells. All transfections were completed in triplicate wells and were repeated three times biologically. All luciferase values were normalized to the pGL3-basic vector (set to 1). * p< 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests with unequal variance.

    Article Snippet: Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine.

    Techniques: Protein Binding, Binding Assay, Control, Infection, Positive Control, Negative Control, ChIP-qPCR, Two Tailed Test, Luciferase, Construct, Generated, Sequencing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

    A model illustrating how CTCF insulators regulate VP16 de novo gene expression upon HSV-1 reactivation. Beige line indicates HSV-1 genome. Rectangles on the genome denote elements regulatory elements: blue: LAT enhancer; red/green: VP16 promoter; yellow: insulators. Red line denotes transcriptional repression while green line denotes activation. In latency, CTUL1 and another unidentified insulator are enriched with CTCF protein and anchored by the cohesin complex. This structure insulates LTE from turning on the VP16 promoter. In reactivation, CTCF proteins evict from the insulators and cohesin moves away. The loss of enhancer-blocking activity allows LTE to turn on the VP16 promoter.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: In HSV-1, the LAT Enhancer Drives Pre-IE VP16 Transcription to Initiate Reactivation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.06.697999

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A model illustrating how CTCF insulators regulate VP16 de novo gene expression upon HSV-1 reactivation. Beige line indicates HSV-1 genome. Rectangles on the genome denote elements regulatory elements: blue: LAT enhancer; red/green: VP16 promoter; yellow: insulators. Red line denotes transcriptional repression while green line denotes activation. In latency, CTUL1 and another unidentified insulator are enriched with CTCF protein and anchored by the cohesin complex. This structure insulates LTE from turning on the VP16 promoter. In reactivation, CTCF proteins evict from the insulators and cohesin moves away. The loss of enhancer-blocking activity allows LTE to turn on the VP16 promoter.

    Article Snippet: Viral genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR using primers and probe specific for HSV-1 DNA polymerase (Table S2). qPCRs were performed using TaqManTM Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), no AmpEraseTM UNG (Applied biosystems 4352042) on an Agilent AriaMx Real-Time PCR machine.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Activation Assay, Blocking Assay, Activity Assay

    Primers used for plasmid construction.

    Journal: Viruses

    Article Title: Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1–Encoded miR-H2-3p Manipulates Cytosolic DNA–Stimulated Antiviral Innate Immune Response by Targeting DDX41

    doi: 10.3390/v11080756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers used for plasmid construction.

    Article Snippet: HSV-1-encoded DNA polymerase UL30 was employed to construct a standard plasmid named pMD18-T-UL30 using a pMD TM 18-T Vector Cloning Kit (TaKaRa Bio, Dalian, China).

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation

    miR-H2-3p promoted HSV-1 replication and gene expression in THP-1 cells. ( A ) THP-1 cells were transfected with miR-H2-3p mimics or negative control (NC) (final concentration of 100 nM) for 24 h, and then infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 1 for 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, as indicated. The viral titers in the culture supernatant were determined by the CCID 50 method. ( B ) Constructed pMD18-T-UL30 plasmids were subjected to 10 times series dilution and used as a template to amplify the viral UL30 gene fragment by qPCR. Linear regression analysis with plasmid copy numbers and cycle threshold (C t ) was performed. R, Reliability; E, amplification efficiency; p, Pearson correlation coefficient. ( C ) THP-1 cells were treated as in ( A ), and the viral genome copy numbers in THP-1 cells were determined by qPCR to amplify the viral UL30 gene fragment. ( D ) THP-1 cells were co-transfected with miR-H2-3p mimics and negative control (NC) at various final concentrations for 24 h, as indicated, and then infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 1 for 24 h. THP-1 cells were harvested, and total RNA was extracted. The expression of TK, gC, and ICP0 was determined by qRT-PCR, and the values were normalized to GAPDH. Data are the means ± SD ( n = 3) from one representative experiment. Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.

    Journal: Viruses

    Article Title: Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1–Encoded miR-H2-3p Manipulates Cytosolic DNA–Stimulated Antiviral Innate Immune Response by Targeting DDX41

    doi: 10.3390/v11080756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: miR-H2-3p promoted HSV-1 replication and gene expression in THP-1 cells. ( A ) THP-1 cells were transfected with miR-H2-3p mimics or negative control (NC) (final concentration of 100 nM) for 24 h, and then infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 1 for 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, as indicated. The viral titers in the culture supernatant were determined by the CCID 50 method. ( B ) Constructed pMD18-T-UL30 plasmids were subjected to 10 times series dilution and used as a template to amplify the viral UL30 gene fragment by qPCR. Linear regression analysis with plasmid copy numbers and cycle threshold (C t ) was performed. R, Reliability; E, amplification efficiency; p, Pearson correlation coefficient. ( C ) THP-1 cells were treated as in ( A ), and the viral genome copy numbers in THP-1 cells were determined by qPCR to amplify the viral UL30 gene fragment. ( D ) THP-1 cells were co-transfected with miR-H2-3p mimics and negative control (NC) at various final concentrations for 24 h, as indicated, and then infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 1 for 24 h. THP-1 cells were harvested, and total RNA was extracted. The expression of TK, gC, and ICP0 was determined by qRT-PCR, and the values were normalized to GAPDH. Data are the means ± SD ( n = 3) from one representative experiment. Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: HSV-1-encoded DNA polymerase UL30 was employed to construct a standard plasmid named pMD18-T-UL30 using a pMD TM 18-T Vector Cloning Kit (TaKaRa Bio, Dalian, China).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Transfection, Negative Control, Concentration Assay, Infection, Construct, Plasmid Preparation, Amplification, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR